Finding common ground on housing
Canadians judge housing by what it costs, not how much gets built.
Read the casePublic debate works better when people are actually heard. We find out what matters to them, test which arguments connect, and make your case.
We test your messages against a control group before launch, so you know which ones help your case and which ones hurt it.
Hover, tab to or tap a bar to see each result.
| Message A | +7 pts (±1.8) |
|---|---|
| Message B | +1 pt (±1.8) |
| Message C | −4 pts (±1.8) |
We test your message before you put budget or reputation behind it.
Fast enough for the news cycle, rigorous enough to stand up to scrutiny.
You see how we reached an answer, and what the data can’t tell you.
We use AI where it strengthens the evidence, and help your team adopt it responsibly.
Canadians judge housing by what it costs, not how much gets built.
Read the caseA climate adaptation case built on how Canadians actually see the risk.
Read the caseOne message worked. One would have backfired. We caught it first.
Read the caseMost Canadians worry about housing costs, especially younger renters. We asked which policies they think would help, and who should decide on zoning.
Read moreMost Canadians feel safe where they live, but they’re split on whether it’s getting better or worse.
Read moreTell us what you’re working on. We’ll tell you what the evidence can do.